J'ai des éléments de réponses qui comparent le micro au AKG et au neumann...
Mais j'aimerais bien avoir d'autres avis.
=>
Up against an AKG 414 B/ULS, the Phantom C had much clearer upper mids and highs but seemed a bit sibilant. Low-end response was light compared with the 414, especially in the range of electric bass guitar. However, I should add that that particular 414, a favorite of mine for recording electric bass, has an atypically dark sound. Self-noise was comparable, and the Brauner's output was about 10 dB higher than the 414's.
The next comparison — with a Neumann TLM 103 — showed the Brauner to be competitive in terms of certain specs: output and noise levels were closely matched. The low-end contours of the two mics were similar, though I found the Neumann to have a more solid punch in the bass and kick drum range. Again, the Phantom C sounded a bit sizzly in comparison, and it emphasized some unpleasant buzziness in a muted trombone passage. (Although I have often recommended the TLM 103 as an excellent all-around studio mic, it is too bright for my taste on some vocalists.)
Le 414 dispose de plusieurs directivités, et c'est un avantage, mais si tu veux vraiment mieux, le Brauner fait l'affaire. Ou encore le U87 Neumann qui reste une référence
Pour avoir travaillé avec les 2 :
ce sont 2 produits de "philosophie" un peu différentes
mais s'il faut trancher, oui, le Brauner est excellent dans sa catégorie
... à voir le budget